Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Vrebosch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Vrebosch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a smalltown mayor who does not pass WP:NPOL for the role, and not citing nearly enough (or really any at all, actually) reliable source coverage to get him past WP:GNG instead. It also merits mention that the article was originally created by User:Louisevrebosch, a conflict of interest. It may have been legitimate by the standards of 2007, but by 2014-vintage standards the notability and sourcing simply aren't there. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 06:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 06:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Falls amazing far short of notability requirements for politicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 13:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - yeah, COI aside, there isn't enough there to establish notability. There's plenty of local coverage but nothing to suggest notability beyond a very small geographic area. St★lwart¹¹¹ 02:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agree to reasons above. AAA3AAA (talk) 07:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.